U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1972

United States v. James Allen De Clue, Jr.

United States v. James Allen De Clue, Jr.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 17, 1972 · Koelsch, Ely, Trask
454 F.2d 1174 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. James Allen De Clue, Jr.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

De Clue pleaded guilty to the offense of bank robbery, 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). He appeals from the judgment of conviction, contending (1) that the sentence imposed by the district judge was unduly harsh, (2) that the assistance rendered to him by his trial counsel was ineffective.

Neither of De Clue’s contentions has any merit whatsoever. Accordingly, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.