United States of America, and v. Joel Mark De Smet
Opinion
The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.
We decide here that if there was some irregularity in the “call” process, there is no evidence of prejudice to De Smet.
However, we reject the contention that there was irregularity in the “calling.”
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Joel Mark DE SMET, Appellant
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published