U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1972

United States of America, and v. Joel Mark De Smet

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 11, 1972 · Chambers, Hamlin, Jameson, Per Curiam

456 F.2d 1311; 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10168 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Joel Shawn (argued), of Lukes & Bassoni, San Francisco, Cal., for appellant., Stephen E. Clark (argued), of Athearn, Chandler, & Hoffman, James L. Browning, Jr., U. S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Gregg Steven Strayhorn (2d Cir. 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction in this selective service case is affirmed.

We decide here that if there was some irregularity in the “call” process, there is no evidence of prejudice to De Smet.

However, we reject the contention that there was irregularity in the “calling.”

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.