U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1972

Gregory Scott, Also Known as Jack T. Ruud, and v. Carl G. Hocker, Warden, Nevada State Prison

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 11, 1972 · Chambers, Hamlin, Jameson, Per Curiam

460 F.2d 303; 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10163 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

J. Rayner Kjeldsen, Esq. (argued), Reno, Nev., for appellant., Herbert F. Ahlswede (argued) Dep. Atty. Gen., Robert List, Atty. Gen., Carson City, Nev.; Robert Rose, Dist. Atty., Reno, Nev., for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Geary v. State (Nev. 1975)
Scott v. State (Nev. 1972)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The district court order denying Scott habeas corpus relief without a hearing is affirmed.

We find the “speedy trial” contentions do not rise to such proportions as to show a denial of constitutional right.

Also, we reject the contention that the final search of the car (the car had been previously under the control of Scott) was improper. We think that the search was perhaps an administrative search, proper as such and not too untimely. It also would appear that the last search (which was a re-search) was proper under the warrant issued a few days before.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.