U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1972

United States v. Jack Damian Welp

United States v. Jack Damian Welp
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 26, 1972 · Hamlin, Duniway, Jameson
469 F.2d 688 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Jack Damian Welp

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

A search incident to an arrest for robbery of the Citizens Valley Bank, Shedd, Oregon, revealed $369.00 cash on Welp’s immediate person. Welp was subsequently tried and convicted of that bank robbery, and we affirmed. United States v. Welp, 446 F.2d 867 (9th Cir. 1971).

The money in question was turned over to the said bank. Appellant filed a petition with the District Court seeking the return of the money to him. After a hearing, the District Court dismissed appellant’s petition, having found that the $369.00 was a product of the bank rob-ery, and belonged to the bank. Welp appeals from this determination.

Questions of fact determined by the trial judge must be upheld on review unless “clearly erroneous.” Campbell v. United States, 373 U.S. 487, 493, 83 S.Ct. 1356, 10 L.Ed.2d 501 (1963); United States v. Page, 302 F.2d 81, 85 (9th Cir. 1962). A “definite and firm conviction” that a mistake was committed below is a prerequisite to appellate reversal. United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364, 395, 68 S.Ct. 525, 92 L.Ed. 746 (1940).

Applying these standards we hold that under the facts of this case the judgment must be affirmed.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.