The judgment of conviction in this case of passing counterfeit money is affirmed.

An officer’s recounted statement of another’s passing a counterfeit bill was non-prej udicial.

And we find the testimony about a call to the sheriff’s office for a name check did not taint the record. No motions to strike were made with reference to either of the foregoing statements. There was only a motion for a mistrial.

We think knowledge could be inferred from the circumstances.

Bail is revoked effective now.