RIGGS v. JAMES
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
RIGGS v. JAMES, 470 F.2d 996 (9th Cir. 1972)
32 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 73
RIGGS v. JAMES
Opinion of the Court
The challenged Orders of the District Court are affirmed upon the authority of Lines v. Frederick, 400 U.S. 18, 91 S.Ct. 113, 27 L.Ed.2d 124 (1970), and the carefully reasoned opinion of District Judge Wollenberg. In re Cedor, 337 F.Supp. 1103 (D.C.N.D.Cal. 1972).
We cannot see that our opinion in any way conflicts with In re Aveni, 458 F.2d 972 (6th Cir. 1972). There, a clearly different problem was presented.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- In the Matter of Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt. In the Matter of Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt. James H. RIGGS, Trustee and v. Clyde R. JAMES, Bankrupt and Appellee Edward M. WALSH, Trustee and v. Michael W. CEDOR, Bankrupt and
- Status
- Published