U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1973

Robert Bustamonte v. Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, California Conservation Center

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 12, 1973 · Ely

479 F.2d 1047; 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 8828 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

S. Thomas Pollack (argued), Stuart P. Tobisman, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant., Clifford K. Thompson, Jr., Deputy Atty. Gen. (argued), Thomas C. Lynch, Atty. Gen., Deraid E. Granberg, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

United States v. Chaney (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 1983)
State v. White (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1997)
State v. Arias (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1992)
State v. Jones (Mo. Ct. App. 1990)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ELY, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

Before HAMLIN, MERRILL and

By order of the Supreme Court, Merle R. Schneckloth, Superintendent, Califor *1048 nia Conservation Center v. Robert Clyde Bustamonte, No. 71-732, entered May 29, 1973, 412 U.S. 218, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854, our judgment heretofore entered in this case 448 F.2d 699, was reversed and the case remanded for further proceedings.

Judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.