Daniel P. Murphy v. Hoyt C. Cupp

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Daniel P. Murphy v. Hoyt C. Cupp, 479 F.2d 1327 (9th Cir. 1973)
Ely, Hufstedler, Per Curiam

Daniel P. Murphy v. Hoyt C. Cupp

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

In a previous opinion concerning the subject cause, we reversed the judgment of the District Court. Murphy v. Cupp, 461 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1972). Thereafter, the appellee’s petition for certiorari was granted, and the Supreme Court, reversing our judgment, has now remanded the cause to this court, “for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of this Court.” Cupp v. Murphy, 412 U.S. 291, 93 S.Ct. 2000, 36 L.Ed. 2d 900 (1973).

The Supreme Court’s mandate has now issued. Pursuant to that mandate, we now hold that the District Court’s judgment should be, and it hereby is,

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Daniel P. MURPHY, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Hoyt C. CUPP, Respondent-Appellee
Status
Published