U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1975

In the Matter of Monte J. Morris, Esq. United States of America v. David Lee Alexander

In the Matter of Monte J. Morris, Esq. United States of America v. David Lee Alexander
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 8, 1975 · Chambers, Trask, Der Heydt
521 F.2d 794 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Monte J. Morris (argued), Henderson, Nev., for defendant-appellant., Daniel Henry, Asst. U. S. Atty. (appeared), Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff-appellee.

In the Matter of Monte J. Morris, Esq. United States of America v. David Lee Alexander

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

After a hearing Monte J. Morris, counsel of record for appellant, is assessed a penalty of three hundred dollars, under Rule 46(c), F.R.A.P., for failure to prosecute this criminal appeal with due diligence.

Payment is to be made to the Clerk of this Court within 14 days from the date of the filing of this order. The payment, in due course, will be transmitted to the Treasurer of the United States.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.