U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1975

United States v. Robert Lee Nobles

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 24, 1975 · Ely, Kilkenny, Enright

522 F.2d 1274; 1975 U.S. App. LEXIS 12651 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Nicholas R. Allis, Deputy Federal Public Defender, Los Angeles, Cal. (argued), for defendant-appellant., Darrell McIntyre, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffappellee.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Central Soya Co., Inc. v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co. (United States District Court, Oklahoma Western 1982)
Commissioner of Agriculture v. Fontenot (La. Ct. App. 1982)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION

Before ELY and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges, and ENRIGHT, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, dated June 23, 1975, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed. United States v. Nobles, 422 U.S. 225, 95 S.Ct. 2160, 45 L.Ed.2d 141 (1975), rev’g United States *1275 v. Brown, 501 F.2d 146, 150-157 (9th Cir. 1974). The panel has reconsidered all issues raised by the appellant, and finds no grounds for reversal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.