Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Ross v. United States Attorney's Office

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Ross v. United States Attorney's Office, 511 F.2d 524 (9th Cir. 1975)
Goodwin, Koelsch, Renfrew

Ross v. United States Attorney's Office

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

The well-settled principle that mandamus does not lie to compel a United States District Attorney to perform a discretionary act (Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v. Rockefeller, 477 F.2d 375 (2nd Cir. 1973)) is dispositive of this appeal.

Affirmed.

Reference

Full Case Name
Michael S. ROSS v. The UNITED STATES ATTORNEY'S OFFICE for the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA including Messrs. Robert C. Bonner and Michael Sulner, Assistant and Deputy Attorney, Criminal Complaints
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
↑