O'Reilly v. National Labor Relations Board
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
The Supreme Court vacated the judgments in these cases and remanded them for reconsideration in light of N.L.R.B. v. Boeing Company, 412 U.S. 67, 93 S.Ct. 1952, 36 L.Ed.2d 752 (1973). Machinists and Aerospace Workers Local 504 v. O’Reilly, 414 U.S. 807, 94 S.Ct. 36, 38 L.Ed.2d 43 (1973).
In No. 71 — 1853, we continue to adhere to those portions of our opinion, reported at 472 F.2d 416 (9th Cir. 1972), holding that the Board properly defined the issues before it and that the “no-strike” provision of the collective bargaining agreement had no application to the honoring of a sister union’s lawful picket line.
As for the other issue in the case, the Supreme Court has settled that it is
Accordingly, the petition to review the order of the National Labor Relations Board is denied.
In No. 26,892, the single issue presented is that which is now concluded by Boeing. Therefore, the petition to review the order of the National Labor Relations Board is denied.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- David O'REILLY v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, and International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL—CIO, Local Lodge No. 504, Intervenor. MORTON SALT COMPANY, a division of Morton International, Inc. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, and International Association of Machinists, Oakland Lodge No. 284, International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO, Intervenor
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Published