U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1976

United States v. Henry Ogle Watson

United States v. Henry Ogle Watson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 22, 1976 · Ely, Goodwin, Murray, Per Curiam
532 F.2d 1323 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Henry Ogle Watson

Opinion

OPINION

Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and MURRAY, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:

We originally reversed Watson’s conviction, holding that certain incriminating evidence should have been suppressed. 504 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1974). Judge Goodwin dissented.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed our decision, and remanded the cause for further proceedings in conformity with its opinion. 423 U.S. 411, 96 S.Ct. 820, 46 L.Ed.2d 598, 44 U.S.L.W. 4112 (1976).

The mandate of the Supreme Court has now been received. Pursuant to that mandate and our further consideration of Watson’s appeal in the light of the Supreme Court’s opinion, we now hold that Watson’s judgment of conviction should be, and the same hereby is,

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.