United States v. Henry Ogle Watson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Henry Ogle Watson, 532 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir. 1976)
Ely, Goodwin, Murray, Per Curiam

United States v. Henry Ogle Watson

Opinion

OPINION

Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and MURRAY, * District Judge. PER CURIAM:

We originally reversed Watson’s conviction, holding that certain incriminating evidence should have been suppressed. 504 F.2d 849 (9th Cir. 1974). Judge Goodwin dissented.

The Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed our decision, and remanded the cause for further proceedings in conformity with its opinion. 423 U.S. 411, 96 S.Ct. 820, 46 L.Ed.2d 598, 44 U.S.L.W. 4112 (1976).

The mandate of the Supreme Court has now been received. Pursuant to that mandate and our further consideration of Watson’s appeal in the light of the Supreme Court’s opinion, we now hold that Watson’s judgment of conviction should be, and the same hereby is,

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Henry Ogle WATSON, Appellant
Status
Published