Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

United States v. Laura Elena Esquer-Rivera, United States of America v. Anacleto Nava-Bibayoff

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Laura Elena Esquer-Rivera, United States of America v. Anacleto Nava-Bibayoff, 542 F.2d 521 (9th Cir. 1976)
1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7061

United States v. Laura Elena Esquer-Rivera, United States of America v. Anacleto Nava-Bibayoff

Opinion

542 F.2d 521

UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Laura Elena ESQUER-RIVERA, Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Anacleto NAVA-BIBAYOFF, Appellant.

Nos. 74-1110, 74-1099.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Sept. 20, 1976.

1

Michael J. McCabe (argued), of Federal Defenders, San Diego, Cal., for appellants.

2

James W. Meyers (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

3

Before ELY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* District Judge.

4

The court now being fully advised, the petition for rehearing filed July 24, 1975, is allowed; the opinion filed July 1, 1974 (500 F.2d 313), is withdrawn; and the judgment of the district court is affirmed on the authority of United States v. Martinez-Fuerte et al., --- U.S. ----, 96 S.Ct. 3074, 49 L.Ed.2d --- (1976), reversing 514 F.2d 308 (9th Cir. 1975).

*

The Honorable William G. East, United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation

Reference

Status
Published
↑