United States v. Adams

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit May 12, 1976

United States v. Adams, 536 F.2d 303 (9th Cir. 1976)

Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before MERRILL and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON,* District Judge. PER CURIAM:

The showing here made as to whether normal investigative procedures have been tried and failed, or that they reasonably appear to be unlikely to succeed if tried, or to be too dangerous, is undistinguishable from the showing made in United States v. Kalustian et al., 529 F.2d 585 (9th Cir. 1975), and there held to be insufficient. On the authority of that case,

Judgment reversed.

Reference

Full Case Name: United States v. Truman Lloyd ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Doris WHITE, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Leo FIX, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Vonnie YANCEY, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. William HAYDEN, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Fred SCHWARY
Cited By: 3 cases
Status: Published