United States v. Giese

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit March 9, 1976

United States v. Giese, 537 F.2d 326 (9th Cir. 1976)

Opinion of the Court

ORDER OF DISBARMENT

Before CARTER, WRIGHT and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges.

Attorney H. Peter Young of Venice, California, has been before this court on January 8, 1976, and March 9, 1976, having been ordered to show cause why penalties should not be imposed for his failure to prosecute the appeals in two criminal causes, in each of which he was acting as counsel or co-counsel. See In Matter of Young, Esq., 537 F.2d 323 (9th Cir. 1976). His derelictions *327have contributed to the ultimate dismissal of the appeals in both matters.1 His conduct throughout the history of the two cases demonstrates that he lacks the professional qualifications and integrity which are requisite in attorneys who practice in the federal courts.

IT IS ORDERED that H. Peter Young be disbarred from further practice before this court and that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

. Orders of Dismissal, United States v. Giese, Docket No. 74-3407 (9th Cir. Mar. 9, 1976); United States v. Eaglin, Docket No. 75-2720 (9th Cir. March 9, 1976).

Reference

Full Case Name: In the Matter of H. Peter YOUNG, Esq., UNITED STATES of America v. Frank Stearns GIESE, Defendant-Appellant UNITED STATES of America v. Raymond EAGLIN
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published