U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1979

Union Offset, a Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Union Offset, a Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 23, 1979 · No. 77-2831 · Ely, Per Curiam, Sneed, Takasugi
603 F.2d 90; 44 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5652; 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 12304 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Gregg M. Anderson, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner-appellant., M. Carr Ferguson, R. Bruce Johnson, Asst. U. S. Attys., Washington, D. C., for respondent-appellee.

Union Offset, a Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Taxpayer, Union Offset, a corporation, appeals from a decision of the Tax Court finding the taxpayer liable for accumulated earnings taxes under section 531 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 in the following amounts:

Scanned image of a quoted passage in this opinion. The text of this passage is not available in machine-readable form.
September 30, 1968 $11,427.08
September 30, 1969 $12,073.78
September 30, 1970 $13,954.14
September 30, 1971 $11,717.55

Taxpayer’s principal contention is that its accumulated earnings and profits during the years in question were reasonable for the present and anticipated needs of its printing, lithography and commercial real estate operations. In effect, the Tax Court found that the accumulations were in excess of the needs of its printing and lithography business and that its plans to enter the real estate business were insufficiently specific and definite to justify the accumulations. The Tax Court, therefore, concluded that the taxpayer was formed or availed of for the purpose of avoiding income tax with respect to its shareholders by permitting its earnings to accumulate.

Our scope of review in cases of this type is very narrow. See Helvering v. National Grocery Co., 304 U.S. 282, 58 S.Ct. 932, 82 L.Ed. 1346 (1938). We have reviewed the Tax Court’s findings and conclude that its findings of fact and its conclusions of law as reflected in its opinion are not erroneous in any material respect.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.