Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1980

Catalano, Inc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Target Sales, Inc.

Catalano, Inc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Target Sales, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 11, 1980
625 F.2d 331; 1980 U.S. App. LEXIS 14982 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Catalano, Inc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Target Sales, Inc.

Opinion

625 F.2d 331

CATALANO, INC., et al., on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
TARGET SALES, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 77-2221, 77-2222.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted May 27, 1980.
Decided Aug. 11, 1980.

1

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

2

Jack B. Owens, Orrick, Herrington, Rowley & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for plaintiffs-appellants; Richard J. Lucas, San Francisco, Cal., James P. Samarco, Fresno, Cal., on brief.

3

G. Richard Doty, McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for defendants-appellees; J. Wallace Upton, Fresno, Cal., Pamela A. Rymer, Los Angeles, Cal., Ted R. Frame, Coalinga, Cal., on brief.

4

Before WALLACE and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and BLUMENFELD*, District Judge.

5

We further this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc., et al., --- U.S. ---, 100 S.Ct. 1925, 64 L.Ed.2d 580 (1980).

*

Honorable M. Joseph Blumenfeld, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑