U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1980

Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 11, 1980

625 F.2d 331 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Jack B. Owens, Orrick, Herrington, Row-ley & Sutcliffe, San Francisco, Cal., argued, for plaintiffs-appellants; Richard J. Lucas, San Francisco, Cal., James P. Samarco, Fresno, Cal., on brief., G. Richard Doty, McCutchen, Black, Ver-leger & Shea, Los Angeles, Cal., argued, for defendants-appellees; J. Wallace Upton, Fresno, Cal., Pamela A. Rymer, Los Ange-les, Cal., Ted R. Frame, Coalinga, Cal., on brief.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Catalano, Inc., on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Target Sales, Inc. (9th Cir. 1980)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

We remand this case to the district court for further proceedings in accordance with Catalano, Inc. v. Target Sales, Inc., et al., -U.S. -, 100 S.Ct. 1925, 64 L.Ed.2d 580 (1980).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.