Capps v. Atiyeh
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Capps v. Atiyeh, 652 F.2d 823 (9th Cir. 1981)
1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 10868
Capps v. Atiyeh
Opinion of the Court
The case is ordered submitted. The district court’s judgment is vacated. See Capps v. Atiyeh, 495 F.Supp. 802 (D.Ore. 1980), stayed, Atiyeh v. Capps, 449 U.S. 1312, 101 S.Ct. 829, 66 L.Ed.2d 785 (Rehnquist, Circuit Justice, 1981). The case is remanded for further consideration and specific findings in light of Rhodes v. Chapman, - U.S. -, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981) and Wright v. Rushen, 642 F.2d 1129 (9th Cir. 1981).
Appellants’ motion to submit supplemental briefs is denied.
JUDGMENT VACATED and CASE REMANDED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Tom CAPPS, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. Victor ATIYEH, Governor of the State of Oregon Robert J. Watson, Administrator of the Corrections Division of the State of Oregon Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary J. C. Keeney, Assistant Superintendent of the Oregon State Penitentiary George E. Sullivan, Superintendent of the Oregon State Correctional Institution Bill G. Cogswell, Ira Blalock, Elizabeth Brown, Chalmers L. Jones, and Hazel Hayes, Members of the Oregon Board of Parole, Defendants-Appellants Joe WEST, Plaintiffs-Respondents v. Victor ATIYEH, Governor of the State of Oregon Robert J. Watson, Administrator of the Corrections Division of Oregon Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary George E. Sullivan, Superintendent, Oregon State Correctional Institution Bill G. Cogswell, Ira Blalock, Elizabeth Browne, Chalmers L. Jones, and Hazel Hayes, Members of the Oregon Board of Parole
- Status
- Published