Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1983

Eva Rehner v. Baxter Rice, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California

Eva Rehner v. Baxter Rice, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 3, 1983
717 F.2d 492; 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 16350 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Eva Rehner v. Baxter Rice, Individually and as Director of the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California

Opinion

717 F.2d 492

Eva REHNER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Baxter RICE, Individually and as Director of the Department
of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of
California, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 77-2409.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Feb. 10, 1983.
Decided Oct. 3, 1983.

Stephan V. Quesenberry, Seattle, Wash., Art Bunce, Escondido, Cal., Indian Legal Services, for Rehner.

William R. Winship, Jr., Alan S. Meth, San Diego, Cal., argued, for Rice; Evelle J. Younger, Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., on brief.

Before BROWNING, CHOY, GOODWIN, WALLACE, KENNEDY, TANG, FARRIS, PREGERSON, POOLE, CANBY, REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

In accordance with the Supreme Court's decision in Rice v. Rehner, --- U.S. ----, 103 S.Ct. 3291, 77 L.Ed.2d 961 (U.S. 1983), reversing and remanding 678 F.2d 1340 (9th Cir. 1982), the judgment of the district court dismissing the complaint is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑