U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1984

Levi Strauss & Co., a Delaware Corporation v. Blue Bell, Inc., a Delaware Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 31, 1984 · Browning, Choy, Goodwin, Wallace, Sneed, Kennedy, Anderson, Hug, Tang, Skopil, Schroeder, Fletcher, Farris, Pregerson, Alarcon, Ferguson, Nelson, Canby, Boochever, Norris, Reinhardt, Beezer

734 F.2d 409; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 22010 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

M. Laurence Popofsky, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant., Donald Kaul, Brownstein, Zeidman & Schomer, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Levi Strauss & Co., Applicant/appellant v. Genesco, Inc., Opposer/appellee (Fed. Cir. 1984)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Upon a vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment, 732 F.2d 676, is withdrawn.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.