Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1984

Midkiff v. Tom

Midkiff v. Tom
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 9, 1984 · Alarcon, Ferguson, Poole
740 F.2d 15 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Clinton R. Ashford, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiffs-appellants., A. Bernard Bays, William E. Atwater, Dennis E.W. O’Connor, John A. Roney, Stubenberg, Roney, Hartnett, Lawhn, Pong & Kuwaski, Michael A. Lilly, Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees.

Midkiff v. Tom

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

By its decision of May 30, 1984, the Supreme Court of the United States, in Hawaii Housing Authority, et al v. Midkiff, et al., — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2321, 81 L.Ed.2d 186 (1984), reversed the decision of this court reported at 702 F.2d 788 and 725 F.2d 502. Accordingly, we vacate our decisions and remand to the district court for proceedings not inconsistent with the decision of the United States Supreme Court.

It is so ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.