Franklet v. United States
Franklet v. United States
Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before HALL and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges, and SMITH,
In these eleven cases, which were consolidated for this hearing, the appellants all filed income tax returns making claims for war tax credits or deductions. The Internal Revenue Service penalized the appellants for filing “frivolous” income tax returns (26 U.S.C. § 6702) for the year 1982. Appellants challenged the assessments in the District Court for the Northern District of California. Judgments in favor of the United States were entered in all cases.
We note that, since the decision in Franklet, similar results have been reached in Wall v. United States, 756 F.2d 52 (8th Cir. 1985); Kahn v. United States, 753 F.2d 1208 (3d Cir. 1985); and Welch v. United States, 750 F.2d 1101 (1st Cir. 1985). See also Jenney v. United States, 755 F.2d 1384 (9th Cir. 1985).
The Honorable Russell E. Smith, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Montana, sitting by designation.
. One opinion was written to decide eight of the cases which had been consolidated. Another judge, relying on the opinion in Franklet, entered judgment in the three remaining cases, which also had been consolidated.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Sharon FRANKLET v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee Dinah BACHRACH v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee John McCHESNEY-YOUNG and Ann L. McChesney-Young v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee Kolya M. BRAUN v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee Mary McKENNA v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee James T. AYERS v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee Judith L. KAPLAN v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee Timothy A. PEARCE v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee Betty WINKLER v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee Peter C. BREWER and Faith J. Brewer v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee Eugene A. WIENS v. United States
- Cited By
- 5 cases
- Status
- Published