U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1986

United States v. William Richard Minor

United States v. William Richard Minor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided February 18, 1986 · Browning, Kennedy, Alarcon
783 F.2d 154; 1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22294; 1986 Copyright L. Dec. (CCH) 25,986 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Charles C.. Lee, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee., T.J. Pantaleo, Eric S. Engel, Pantaleo & Kudon, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

United States v. William Richard Minor

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

ORDER

Minor was convicted of violations of 17 U.S.C. § 506(a), 18 U.S.C. § 2314, and 18 U.S.C. § 371. We affirmed, United States v. Minor, 756 F.2d 731 (9th Cir. 1985) (per curiam), but stayed the mandate pending disposition by the Supreme Court of Dowling v. United States, 84-589, involving Minor’s co-defendant, Paul Dowling. The Court reversed Dowling’s conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2314, holding the statute does not apply to the interstate transportation of “bootleg” phonorecords manufactured *155 and distributed without the consent of the copyright owners. Dowling v. United States, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3127, 87 L.Ed.2d 152 (1985). The Court then granted certiorari in this case, vacated our judgment, and remanded for reconsideration in light of Dowling, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 401, 88 L.Ed.2d 353 (1985). On the basis of Dowling, we reverse Minor’s conviction for violation of § 2314 (counts 8 and 9). We affirm his conviction on the remaining counts for the reasons stated in our original opinion.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.