Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1987

In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley

In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 29, 1987
808 F.2d 1373; 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 1428 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & Riley

Opinion

808 F.2d 1373

In re WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM SECURITIES LITIGATION.
Henry PUCHALL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
HOUGHTON, CLUCK, COUGHLIN & RILEY, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 86-3594.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 29, 1987.

Paul M. Bernstein, Melvyn I. Weiss, New York City, James R. Irwin, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Herbert M. Wachtell, New York City, Camden M. Hall, John L. Mericle, Seattle, Wash., Daniel R. Murdock, New York City, Peter R. Mersereau, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellees.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Upon the vote of a majority of the regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Rule 25 of the Rules of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The previous three-judge panel assignment is withdrawn.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑