Theodore Kanne and Beatriz Kanne, and v. Connecticut General Life Insurance Company, And
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- Kanne v. Connecticut General Life Insurance (9th Cir. 1988)
- Kanne v. Connecticut General Life Insurance (9th Cir. 1988)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Theodore KANNE and Beatriz Kanne, Plaintiffs and Appellees,
v.
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.
Nos. 85-5641, 85-5642.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
July 23, 1987.
Leonard Sacks, Encino, Cal., Carol A. Hay, and Andrew O. Feringa, Lakewood, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees-appellants.
James S. Cline, Suzette Clover, David L. Bacon, and Bruce A. Beckman, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellants-appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Edward Rafeedie, District Judge.
Before FLETCHER and PREGERSON, Circuit Judges and WILKINS*, District Judge.
ORDER
The parties shall submit simultaneous briefs of not more than thirty (30) pages by August 17, 1987, addressing two issues:
1) Whether the insurance policy in question is a plan governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), 29 U.S.C. Sec. 1001, et seq., and
2) Whether Cal.Ins.Code Sec. 790.03(h)(2) is preempted by ERISA.
Oral argument may be scheduled at a later date.
This court's opinion, filed June 4, 1987, 819 F.2d 204, is hereby withdrawn.
Hon. Philip C. Wilkins, Senior United States District Judge, for the Eastern District of California, sitting by designation
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.