U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1987

Penny Creaton v. Otis Bowen, Patricia Van Berg v. A.N. Shinpoch

Penny Creaton v. Otis Bowen, Patricia Van Berg v. A.N. Shinpoch
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 26, 1987
826 F.2d 6 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Penny Creaton v. Otis Bowen, Patricia Van Berg v. A.N. Shinpoch

Opinion

826 F.2d 6

Penny CREATON, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Otis BOWEN, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
Patricia VAN BERG, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
A.N. SHINPOCH, et al., Defendants-Appellees.

Nos. 86-6148, 86-3870.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted April 7, 1987.
Decided Aug. 26, 1987.

Mark Greenberg, Los Angeles, Cal., and Robin Zukoski, Seattle, Wash., for plaintiffs-appellants.

George Wu, Los Angeles, Cal., and P.K. Abraham, Seattle, Wash., for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Manuel L. Real, Chief Judge, Presiding.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; John C. Coughenour, District Judge, Presiding.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT and HALL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

We affirm for the reasons stated in Gorrie v. Bowen, 809 F.2d 508 (8th Cir. 1987), and Oliver v. Ledbetter, 821 F.2d 1507 (11th Cir. 1987). See also Bowen v. Gilliard, --- U.S. ----, ---- n. 5, 107 S.Ct. 3008, 3013 n. 5, 97 L.Ed.2d 485 (1987) (citing Gorrie with approval).

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.