U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1987

Gilardy v. United States

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 15, 1987 · Beezer, Browning, Farris, Hug, Nelson, Noonan, Norris, Schroeder, Skopil, Sneed, Tang

819 F.2d 913 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scrip and Donald L. Salem, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants., Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Honolulu, Hawaii, Phillip A. Berns, Atty., and Warren A. Schneider, Trial Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Gilardy v. United States (9th Cir. 1987)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Johnson, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 2063, 95 L.Ed.2d 648 (1987), the en banc panel assignment is withdrawn. The case is returned to its original three-judge panel for disposition.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.