U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1987

Meyer v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 22, 1987 · Boochever, Fletcher, Norris

820 F.2d 329 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Brent M. Rosenthal, Russell W. Budd and Janice Robinson, Dallas, Tex., Clark Gasser, Pocatello, Idaho, for plaintiffs-appellants., Christopher Burke, Boise, Idaho, for defendants-appellees.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Charter Oak Fire Insurance v. Broan Nutone, LLC (District Court, W.D. Tennessee 2004)
Randy Gallagher v. Allied Weldery, Inc. Wes Warren (9th Cir. 1992)
Menne v. Celotex Corp. (District Court, D. Kansas 1989)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The district court’s order granting defendants’ motion for summary judgment is vacated.* The case is remanded for the district court to determine whether the actions are timely under Davis v. Moran, 112 Idaho 703, 735 P.2d 1014 (1987) and, if not, whether the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 9658 are applicable.

The district court’s opinion appears at 643 F.Supp. 17 (D.Idaho 1985).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.