Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1988

Jimmy Neuschafer v. Harol Whitley

Jimmy Neuschafer v. Harol Whitley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 28, 1988 · Chambers, Alarcon, Hall
842 F.2d 217; 1988 WL 25015 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Jimmy Neuschafer v. Harol Whitley

Opinion

842 F.2d 217

Jimmy NEUSCHAFER, Petitioner/Appellant,
v.
Harol WHITLEY, et al., Respondents/Appellees.

No. 88-1688.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Order Feb. 29, 1988.
Dissent March 7, 1988.
Order March 28, 1988.

Before ALARCON and HALL, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

The order filed February 29, 1988 has been ordered for publication along with Judge Chambers dissent filed on March 7, 1988.

ORDER

2

A stay of execution is ordered pending final disposition of this appeal.

3

The parties are directed to file simultaneous briefs within 28 days; within 14 days thereafter the parties may file simultaneous responses.

4

Circuit Judge CHAMBERS dissents from this order and will file a separate expression of his views.

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge, dissenting:

5

My dissent on our Court's order for briefs is that I think we had such splendid oral presentations on February 29 that I think we have enough in the record to decide the issues before us without the briefing that was ordered.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.