U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1988

Sergeant Perry J. Watkins v. United States Army

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 8, 1988 · Browning, Goodwin, Wallace, Hug, Tang, Schroeder, Fletcher, Farris, Pregerson, Alarcon, Poole, Nelson, Canby, Norris, Reinhardt, Beezer, Hall, Wiggins, Brunetti, Kozinski, Noonan, Thompson, O'Scannlain, Leavy, Trott

847 F.2d 1362; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8315; 46 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,063; 1988 WL 57538 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

David Falk v. Secretary of the Army (2d Cir. 1989)
BenShalom v. Marsh (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 1989)
Steffan v. Cheney (District Court, District of Columbia 1991)
James M. Woodward v. United States (Fed. Cir. 1989)
Sergeant Perry J. Watkins v. United States Army (9th Cir. 1988)
D. Jean Pope, and Quali-Built, Inc. v. Savings Bank of Puget Sound, and Ticor Title Insurance Co. And Bruce H. Hurst (9th Cir. 1988)
BenShalom v. Marsh (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 1988)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*1363 ORDER

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, GOODWIN, WALLACE, HUG, TANG, s SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of the nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.