Derek A. McCall v. George Deeds
Derek A. McCall v. George Deeds
849 F.2d 1259; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 8788; 1988 WL 66021
(Federal Reporter, Second Series)
Cases that cite this one
13 later published cases cite this decision.
- Estate of Kish (N.D. 2024)
- In re: Terrance Alexander Tomkow Zafar David Khan (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2017)
- In re: Terrance Alexander Tomkow Zafar David Khan (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2017)
- In re: Terrance Alexander Tomkow Zafar David Khan (United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of The Ninth Circuit 2017)
- Freddie Lewis v. Sheriff's Dept Bossier Parish, et (5th Cir. 2012)
- Freddie Lewis v. Sheriff's Dept Bossier Parish, et (5th Cir. 2012)
- Cruey v. Early (4th Cir. 2010)
- Wansley v. Speed Corp. (Miss. 2005)
- Ed Wansley v. Speed Corporation (Miss. 2002)
- Southern California Edison Co. v. Peabody Western Coal Co. (Ariz. 1999)
- Alfredo Patrick Acosta, and Rose Malfabon, Applicant-In-Intervention/appellant v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., a California Corporation (9th Cir. 1994)
- Tri-State Generation And Transmission Association, Inc. v. Shoshone River Power, Inc. (10th Cir. 1989)
- Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Shoshone River Power, Inc. (10th Cir. 1989)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Appellant appeals from the district court’s denial of Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) certification. However, the denial of Rule 54(b) certification is not appealable. See Makuc v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., 692 F.2d 172, 174 (1st Cir. 1982). Accordingly, appellee’s motion to dismiss is granted.
Appellees’ motion for an extension of time to file the answering brief is denied as moot.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.