Marvin Bernstein v. Aetna Life & Casualty

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit October 21, 1988

Marvin Bernstein v. Aetna Life & Casualty, 859 F.2d 1395 (9th Cir. 1988)

1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 14580; 1988 WL 109165

Opinion

ORDER

The panel denies the petition for rehearing. The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. No member of the court has requested a vote. Accordingly, the suggestion 'is rejected.

The mandate shall issue forthwith. Upon remand the district court at its option may stay further proceedings pending the outcome of any petition for review of Broomfield v. Lundell, et al. (1 CA-CIV 9470, Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, decided August 9, 1988). To the extent that any decision the Supreme Court of Arizona may issue in Broomfield interprets Arizona law contrary to this court’s interpretation in this case, the district court is not bound by our interpretation.

Reference

Full Case Name: Marvin BERNSTEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. AETNA LIFE & CASUALTY, Et Al., Defendants-Appellees
Status: Published