Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1989

Louis Butler O'Neal v. March Fong Eu Roy E. Bailey, Department of Veterans Administration Dorcas T. Hardy, Commissioner of Social Security

Louis Butler O'Neal v. March Fong Eu Roy E. Bailey, Department of Veterans Administration Dorcas T. Hardy, Commissioner of Social Security
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided January 31, 1989 · Ferguson, Norris, Per Curiam, Wiggins
866 F.2d 314; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 724; 1989 WL 5880 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Louis Butler O’Neal, Represa, Cal, pro se., No appearance for defendants-appellees.

Louis Butler O'Neal v. March Fong Eu Roy E. Bailey, Department of Veterans Administration Dorcas T. Hardy, Commissioner of Social Security

Cases that cite this one

34 later published cases cite this decision. The 23 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Louis Butler O’Neal, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s order dismissing his constitutional tort action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). O’Neal contends that Roy Bailey, a Veterans Administration official, negligently failed to obtain records which would have established that O’Neal had a right to Veteran’s death pension benefits. O’Neal also contends that he is entitled to the benefits.

A plaintiff must plead more than a merely negligent act by a federal official in order to state a colorable claim under Bivens. See Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 330-31, 106 S.Ct. 662, 664-65, 88 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986) (plaintiff must plead more than mere negligence in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action); Tallman v. Reagan, 846 F.2d 494, 495 (8th Cir. 1988) (extending Daniels to a Bivens -type action involving gross negligence), Nichols v. Block, 656 F.Supp. 1436, 1442 (D.Mont. 1987) (“Daniels is applicable by analogy to a Bivens action against federal officials”); Artis v. Petrovsky, 638 F.Supp. 51, 54 (W.D.Mo. 1986) (applying Daniels in a Bivens-type action); see also Schweiker v. Chilicky, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2460, 2480, 101 L.Ed.2d 370 (1988) (Brennan, J. dissenting) (“in order to prevail in any Bivens action, [a plaintiff] must ... prove a deliberate abuse of governmental power rather than mere negligence”). Because O’Neal only alleges negligence, and the pleaded facts indicate that Bailey could not have been more than negligent, the district court properly dismissed O’Neal’s complaint.

The judgment is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.