U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1989

United States v. Jesus Leyva-Villalobos

United States v. Jesus Leyva-Villalobos
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 24, 1989 · Wallace, Alarcon, Norris
872 F.2d 335; 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 5427; 1989 WL 38386 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

United States v. Jesus Leyva-Villalobos

Opinion

On January 24, 1989, the district court denied appellant’s motion to dismiss the indictment and disqualify the special Assistant United States Attorney, finding that neither Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(d) nor 6(e) had been violated. On January 24, 1989, appellant filed a timely interlocutory appeal under United States v. Benjamin, 812 F.2d 548 (9th Cir.), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied (1987).

On March 28, 1989, the Supreme Court held that an order denying a motion to dismiss an indictment for an alleged violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 6(e) is not immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United States, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1494, 103 L.Ed.2d 879. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.