Soderquist v. Fremont County, Idaho
Cases that cite this one
8 later published cases cite this decision. The 7 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Grady v. Commonwealth (Ky. 2010)
- Herrington v. County of Sonoma (9th Cir. 1993)
- Nenana Fuel Co. v. Native Village of Venetie (Alaska 1992)
- Intelligrated Systems, LLC v. Hy-Tek Material Handling Installation Services (District Court, S.D. Ohio 2022)
- Bowles v. Leprino Foods Company (United States District Court for the Eastern District of California 2020)
- Herrington v. County of Sonoma (9th Cir. 1989)
- Herrington v. County of Sonoma (9th Cir. 1989)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Lyle R. SODERQUIST, Krista Soderquist, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
FREMONT COUNTY, IDAHO, Terry Thompson, Bert C. Bates, Kurt
Hillman, Brian Loske, Keith Saurey, Kim Saurey,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 88-3509.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 3, 1989.
Decided Aug. 11, 1989.
Marion J. Callister, District Judge, Presiding.
Before KOELSCH, ALARCON and DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Having thoroughly and carefully reviewed this matter, we adopt as the opinion of this court the Memorandum Opinion of the United States District Court of the District of Idaho dated October 8, 1987 and December 16, 1987.
So ordered.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir.R. 36-3
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.