City of Long Beach v. Standard Oil Co.
Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed April 17, 1989, Long Beach v. Standard Oil, 872 F.2d 1401 (9th
The full court was advised of the amendment to the opinion and the suggestions for rehearing en banc. An active judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. (Fed.R.App.P. 35.)
The opinion in 86-5859/5860 is amended as set forth above, the petitions for rehearing are denied and the suggestions for rehearing en banc are rejected.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- CITY OF LONG BEACH, as trustee for the State of California v. STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA Texaco, Incorporated Exxon Corporation Union Oil Company of California Mobil Oil Corporation Shell Oil Company, Defendants-Appellees STATE OF CALIFORNIA, on behalf of itself and all political subdivisions and special districts within the state similarly situated v. STANDARD OIL CO., Defendants-Appellees CITY OF LONG BEACH v. STANDARD OIL CO., In re COORDINATED PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION— MDL 150. PEOPLE OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA City of Long Beach, as Trustee for the State of California, and the State of California as Beneficiary v. CHEVRON CORPORATION Unocal Corporation Mobil Oil Corporation Shell Oil Company Shell California Production, Inc. Exxon Corporation Exxon Company, USA Texaco, Inc., In re COORDINATED PRETRIAL PROCEEDINGS IN PETROLEUM PRODUCTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION— MDL 150. PEOPLE OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA City of Long Beach, as Trustee for the State of California, and the State of California as Beneficiary v. CHEVRON CORPORATION Unocal Corporation Mobil Oil Corporation Shell Oil Company Shell California Production, Inc. Exxon Corporation Exxon Company, USA Texaco, Inc.
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published