Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1991

Michael Cooper, Husband, in His Own Capacity and as Parent of Abram and Adam...

Michael Cooper, Husband, in His Own Capacity and as Parent of Abram and Adam...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 23, 1991
933 F.2d 798; 91 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3757; 91 Daily Journal DAR 6085; 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11145 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Michael Cooper, Husband, in His Own Capacity and as Parent of Abram and Adam...

Opinion

933 F.2d 798

Michael COOPER, husband, in his own capacity and as parent
of Abram and Adam Cooper, minors; Lidia Cooper, wife, in
her own capacity and as parent of Abram Cooper and Adam
Cooper, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Clarence DUPNIK, Sheriff, Pima County; Tom Taylor, an
employee of Pima County Sheriff's Department;
Weaver Barkman, an employee of Pima
County Sheriff's Department,
Defendants-Appellants.
Michael COOPER, husband, in his own capacity and as parent
of Abram and Adam Cooper, minors; Lidia Cooper, wife, in
her own capacity and as parent of Abram Cooper and Adam
Cooper, minors, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Clarence DUPNIK, Sheriff, Pima County, Defendant,
and
City of Tucson; Tucson Police Department; Peter Ronstadt;
Karen Wright; Gene Scott; Timothy O'Sullivan;
Kay McCall, Defendants-Appellants.

Nos. 88-15661, 88-15685.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

May 23, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona; Richard M. Bilby, Chief Judge.

1

Michael P. Callahan, Deputy County Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for defendants-appellants Clarence Dupnik and Tom Taylor.

2

David L. Berkman, Murphy, Goering, Roberts & Holt, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Weaver Barkman.

3

David F. Toone, Kimble, Gothreau & Nelson, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Peter Ronstadt.

4

Stephen M. Weiss, Karp, Stoklin & Weiss, Winton D. Woods, Michael J. Bloom, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellees.

5

Prior report: 9th Cir., 924 F.2d 1520.

6

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, and THOMAS G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

7

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑