U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1991

Arizona v. City of Austin

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 28, 1991 · Brunetti, Hug, Wallace

940 F.2d 1583 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Thomas Greene, Deputy Atty. Gen., Sacramento, Cal., Patricia A. Cutler, Deputy Atty. Gen., San Francisco, Cal., Thomas F. Catania, Jr., Special Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn., James Prude, Asst. Atty. Gen., Montgomery, Ala., for plaintiffs-appellants States of Cal., Minn., and Ala., Kenneth R. Reed and Dee Ann Mowry Rogers, Phoenix, Arizona, for plaintiff-appellant State of Ariz., Carl W. Divelbiss, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants Arizona Slump Block, Inc. and Smith & Green Corp., David J. Leonard and David H. Nix, Tucson, Ariz., for class members-appellees Allied Concrete, Inc., et al., Kurt W. Melchior, San Francisco, Cal., for class members-appellees Arc Corp. and its subsidiaries., Ralph E. Hunsaker, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellant Arizona Slump Block, Inc.

Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and HUG, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The mandate of the United States Supreme Court certified on April 18, 1989, in California v. ARC America Corp., 490 U.S. 93, 109 S.Ct. 1661, 104 L.Ed.2d 86, reversed the judgment of this court. Accordingly, we vacate our opinion at 817 F.2d 1435 (9th Cir. 1987), reverse the district court, and remand to the district court for further proceedings which are consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.