U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1992

LCO Technical Sales v. Minnesota Min. and Mfg. Co.

LCO Technical Sales v. Minnesota Min. and Mfg. Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 18, 1992
963 F.2d 379; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 23715; 1992 WL 104803 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

LCO Technical Sales v. Minnesota Min. and Mfg. Co.

Opinion

963 F.2d 379

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
LCO TECHNICAL SALES, a California Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, d/b/a 3M Data
Storage Products Division, a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant-Appellee.

No. 91-15736.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted May 13, 1992.
Decided May 18, 1992.

Before BOOCHEVER, REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.

1

MEMORANDUM*

2

We affirm on the ground of estoppel substantially for the reasons set forth in the district court's order granting summary judgment. See Order at 9-11.

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.