U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1992

Raymond A. Schmoll v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Raytech...

Raymond A. Schmoll v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Raytech...
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 26, 1992
977 F.2d 499; 92 Daily Journal DAR 14489; 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8728; 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 27466 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Raymond A. Schmoll v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Raytech...

Opinion

977 F.2d 499

Raymond A. SCHMOLL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ACANDS, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, et al., Defendants,
and
Raytech Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
Raymond A. SCHMOLL, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
ACANDS, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, et al., Defendants,
and
Raytech Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 89-35101, 89-35168.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1992.
Decided Oct. 26, 1992.

William N. Reed, H. Mitchell Cowan, J. Randall Patterson, Watkins Ludlam & Stennis, Jackson, Miss., for defendant-appellant.

Henry Kantor, Jeffrey S. Mutnick, Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon; Owen M. Panner, Chief Judge.

Before: BEEZER, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Under Oregon law, creditors have priority over shareholders in all of the future earnings of an insolvent corporation. We have reviewed the record in No. 89-35168 and we affirm the district court's judgment on the grounds stated in its opinion. Schmoll v. ACandS, Inc., 703 F.Supp. 868 (D.Or. 1988).

2

We dismiss Raytech's appeal of an interlocutory order in No. 89-35101.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.