Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law

Carriger v. Lewis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Carriger v. Lewis, 957 F.2d 1554 (9th Cir. 1992)
Alarcon, Beezer, Browning, Brunetti, Canby, Farris, Fernandez, Fletcher, Hall, Hug, Kleinfeld, Kozinski, Leavy, Nelson, Noonan, Norris, Poole, Pregerson, Reinhardt, Rymer, Scannlain, Schroeder, Tang, Thompson, Trott, Wallace, Wiggins

Carriger v. Lewis

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

*1555Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, BROWNING, HUG, TANG, SCHROEDER, FLETCHER, FARRIS, PREGERSON, ALARCON, POOLE, D.W. NELSON, CANBY, NORRIS, REINHARDT, BEEZER, HALL, WIGGINS, BRUNETTI, KOZINSKI, NOONAN, THOMPSON, O’SCANNLAIN, LEAVY, TROTT, FERNANDEZ, RYMER, T.G. NELSON, and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
Paris Hoyt CARRIGER v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Director of DOC Attorney General, State of Arizona, Respondents-Appellees Paris Hoyt CARRIGER v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Respondent-Appellant Paris Hoyt CARRIGER v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Respondent-Appellee Paris Hoyt CARRIGER v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Respondent-Appellee Paris Hoyt CARRIGER v. Samuel A. LEWIS, Director of DOC
Cited By
1 case
Status
Published
↑