U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1992

Ratti v. City of San Francisco

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 16, 1992 · Boochever, Kozinski, Reinhardt

966 F.2d 532 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Counsel

Robert Gyemant, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellants., Barron L. Weinstein, Deputy City Atty., Sán Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appel-lees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Ratti v. The City And County Of San Francisco (9th Cir. 1992)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

We affirm substantially for the reasons set forth by the District Court in its thorough and well-reasoned order of March 28, 1991 granting summary judgment. Furthermore, we do not find a basis for suspending the normal operation of the one year statute of limitations. We also note without deciding that the action is probably barred in light of Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 762 n. 2, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 2184 n. 2, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989).

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.