U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1993

Arthur William Hite v. Robert Borg, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

Arthur William Hite v. Robert Borg, Warden Attorney General of the State of California
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 17, 1993
993 F.2d 882; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18282; 1993 WL 164710 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Arthur William Hite v. Robert Borg, Warden Attorney General of the State of California

Opinion

993 F.2d 882w

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Arthur William HITE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Robert BORG, Warden; Attorney General of the State of
California, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-55243.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 11, 1992.
Decided May 17, 1993.

NOTE: THE COURT HAS WITHDRAWN THIS OPINION

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.