U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1993

Romberg v. Nichols

Romberg v. Nichols
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 8, 1993
993 F.2d 1453; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4190; 93 Daily Journal DAR 7174; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13314 (Federal Reporter, Second Series)

Romberg v. Nichols

Opinion

993 F.2d 1453

Michael ROMBERG; Debra Romberg, Plaintiffs/Appellees-Cross-Appellants,
v.
Robert NICHOLS; Dennis Lazzari; Hugh Lloyd; Johnny
Jurtado; Thomas Laing; Diane Hannon; R.D.
Campbell, Defendants/Appellants-Cross-Appellees.

Nos. 90-56125, 91-55012.

United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.

June 8, 1993.

Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Keith A. Fink, Cotkin & Collins, Los Angeles, CA, for defendants-appellees.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court.

Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, THOMPSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

1

Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court of the United States, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 1038, 122 L.Ed.2d 348 we vacate the award of attorneys' fees and remand this case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for reconsideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, --- U.S. ----, 113 S.Ct. 566, 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.