U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1993

Pacificare Inc., Dba Pacificare of California v. Vernon D. Martin Sherrie Sue Martin, and Scott Douglas Martin, a Minor

Pacificare Inc., Dba Pacificare of California v. Vernon D. Martin Sherrie Sue Martin, and Scott Douglas Martin, a Minor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 20, 1993 · Norris, Wiggins, O'Scannlain
1 F.3d 963; 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6230; 93 Daily Journal DAR 10725; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20975; 1993 WL 313578 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Pacificare Inc., Dba Pacificare of California v. Vernon D. Martin Sherrie Sue Martin, and Scott Douglas Martin, a Minor

Opinion

ORDER

Submission of this case is deferred and the case is temporarily remanded.

Martin appealed from an order that left the amount of damages undetermined. Counsel for the parties stipulated before this court at oral argument that the amount of damages is an undisputed sum certain and that there are no remaining issues regarding damages. Specifically, the parties stipulated that Pacificare is entitled to full reimburse *964 ment plus prejudgment interest from an agreed time and at an agreed rate. We remand so that the district court can complete the ministerial task of entering an order assessing these damages. Cf. Parks v. Pavkovic, 753 F.2d 1397, 1401-02 (7th Cir. 1985) (where all that remains before the district court is the completion of a ministerial task, the order appealed from is a final judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1291).

We retain jurisdiction over this appeal during the pendency of the limited remand. The district court shall forward a copy of its supplemental order within thirty days from the date of this order.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.