United States v. Demetrius Jerome Hayes
Cases that cite this one
35 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.
- United States v. Daniel Luis Delaney (9th Cir. 2005)
- United States v. Amos (6th Cir. 2007)
- United States v. McCarty (District Court, D. Maine 2006)
- United States v. Delaney (9th Cir. 2005)
- United States v. Fortes (1st Cir. 1998)
- United States v. Fortes (1st Cir. 1998)
- Killoran v. Westhampton Beach School District (2d Cir. 2023)
- United States v. Amos (6th Cir. 2007)
- United States v. Xavier Serna (9th Cir. 2006)
- United States v. Fields (3d Cir. 2006)
- United States v. Serna (9th Cir. 2006)
- United States v. Alvin James Pierce (4th Cir. 2002)
- United States v. Warren J. Brazeau (7th Cir. 2001)
- United States v. Elliot Johnson (4th Cir. 2001)
- United States v. Brazeau, Warren J. (7th Cir. 2001)
- United States v. Steven James Fleener, United States of America v. James Edward Fleener (9th Cir. 1995)
- United States v. Reyes (United States District Court for the Northern District of California 2012)
- United States v. Marcos Hatfield (9th Cir. 2010)
- United States v. Hawkins (6th Cir. 2009)
- United States v. Malik Hawkins (6th Cir. 2009)
- United States v. Emerson (District Court, D. Maine 2006)
- United States v. Powers (District Court, W.D. Virginia 2004)
- United States v. Serna (5th Cir. 2002)
- United States v. Dennis D. Best (7th Cir. 2001)
- United States v. Best, Dennis D. (7th Cir. 2001)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion
We must decide whether possessing an unregistered sawed-off shotgun is a crime of violence for purposes of the Career Offender provisions of the Sentencing Guidelines. We hold that it is and affirm Hayes’ sentence.
I
A jury convicted Hayes of being a felon in possession of a firearm, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g), and possession of an unregistered sawed-off shotgun, 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d). Because the district court found that these were crimes of violence and that Hayes had two previous felony convictions for violent crimes, it sentenced him as a career offender. Hayes appeals his conviction and sentence. We affirmed his conviction in a separate memorandum disposition. Here, we address only his sentencing objection. Because we hold that possession of an unregistered sawed-off shotgun is a crime of violence, we need not decide whether being a felon in possession of a sawed-off shotgun is a crime of violence.
We review de novo the district court’s interpretation of the Guidelines. United States v. Young, 990 F.2d 469, 471 (9th Cir. 1993).
A defendant qualifies as a career offender if he is convicted of a felony that is a crime of violence and has two previous felony convictions for crimes of violence. U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1; Young, 990 F.2d at 470. Section 4B1.2(1) defines a crime of violence as a felony offense under federal or state law that “has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another, or ... involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” Because the statutory definition of Hayes’ unregistered shotgun conviction does not involve the use, attempted use or threatened use of physical force against another, we focus solely on whether the charged conduct presented a serious potential risk of physical injury to another. See Young, 990 F.2d at 471.
We conclude that in Hayes’ ease it does. As we said in United States v. Dunn, 946 F.2d 615, 621 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 401, 116 L.Ed.2d 350 (1991), and United States v. Huffhines, 967 F.2d 314, 321 (9th Cir. 1992); sawed-off shotguns are inherently dangerous, lack usefulness except for violent and criminal purposes and their possession involves the substantial risk of improper physical force. These attributes led Congress to require registration of these weapons. Huffhines, 967 F.2d at 321.
II
We hold that the conduct charged in the unregistered shotgun count of Hayes’ indictment “presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another.” The district court found correctly that Hayes was convicted of a crime of violence for career offender purposes.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.