U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 1993

United States v. Joseph Bernard Widby

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 22, 1993

15 F.3d 1095; 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 37633; 1993 WL 534311 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

15 F.3d 1095
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Joseph Bernard WIDBY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 93-50384.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 6, 1993.*
Decided Dec. 22, 1993.

Before: SNEED, NOONAN, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Joseph Bernard Widby appeals his eight-month sentence imposed following revocation of his supervised release. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Widby's counsel has filed a brief stating that she finds no issues for review. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988), disclosed no issues for review.

We AFFIRM the district court's judgment and GRANT the motion of Teresa Sanchez-Gordon, Esq., to withdraw as counsel of record.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.